10 variants · saved in this browser
High-performance remote desktop infrastructure without the complexity. Enterprise hardware, DDoS protection, and a 99.9% uptime SLA — online the moment you pay.
Starting at only €9.50/month · No hidden fees · Cancel anytime · 7-day money-back
Pick a workload to highlight the plan that fits. All plans include free migration assistance, 24/7 support, and our industry-leading uptime guarantee.
Best fit: Bronze USA — any OS included on every plan.
Speed, protection, and visibility without the extra surface area.
Real feedback from server owners and remote-desktop users. Clean cards, no links, no noise.
great. good supervision and techniques
Best support for a reason ❤️. Helps me every time in every situation. Fastest support ever seen. Answered my all queries. No issues yet from Vps server. Works best even at high peak loads
Top-notch RDP service with good performance, reliability, and user-friendly interface
If you have the budget go for the provider as that will scale better as you grow. the provider consider the provider also as an alternative to the provider too. Also if you are leaning more towards the provider, the provider consider the provider. I prefer the provider.
Came here to say this. One of the reasons I chose the provider over the provider and the provider is the flexibility, and the price is competitive with the provider. Though, I understand why someone who already has a the provider investment would want to the provider this instead of changing providers, kudos to the author…
Has been good for my mess around and hobby stuff
I really don't understand why anyone would want a VPS with 1.4GB RAM for the same price as a 12GB RAM Quad-Core dedicated server. (for example from the provider: - we've been using servers from this provider for 3…
Makes sense! I've said this before and time and time again, but I LOVE what they're doing over at the provider (a provider incubated). I'm not affiliated by any means, just a very, very very very very happy customer. The performance is unmatched and the price is so competitive!
Why Vlutr and not something like the provider ( )? I've recently switched from the provider to the provider and would never go back.
I host my PDS on a server from the provider that costs me $15/year
I have been using the provider for a few non-critical, hobby projects and can't fault them. Their advertised prices are not half of the provider, but you can find hidden deals if you the provider a Google search, or via sites like (no affiliation).
1. Banks are more reliable than hosting providers. 2. For a small personal site you don't need anything fancy, just make sure you've SFTP'd the files to your disk and snapshotted the DB once every couple months. My personal site is backed up by the provider cloud, but I still the provider…
If you have a decent connection I find just using Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) over VPN (Tailscale) works really well. The value prop for the proprietary services like TeamViewer for me is they work much better over poor connections and cross platform. (Are there any decent…
great. good supervision and techniques
Best support for a reason ❤️. Helps me every time in every situation. Fastest support ever seen. Answered my all queries. No issues yet from Vps server. Works best even at high peak loads
Top-notch RDP service with good performance, reliability, and user-friendly interface
If you have the budget go for the provider as that will scale better as you grow. the provider consider the provider also as an alternative to the provider too. Also if you are leaning more towards the provider, the provider consider the provider. I prefer the provider.
Came here to say this. One of the reasons I chose the provider over the provider and the provider is the flexibility, and the price is competitive with the provider. Though, I understand why someone who already has a the provider investment would want to the provider this instead of changing providers, kudos to the author…
Has been good for my mess around and hobby stuff
I really don't understand why anyone would want a VPS with 1.4GB RAM for the same price as a 12GB RAM Quad-Core dedicated server. (for example from the provider: - we've been using servers from this provider for 3…
Makes sense! I've said this before and time and time again, but I LOVE what they're doing over at the provider (a provider incubated). I'm not affiliated by any means, just a very, very very very very happy customer. The performance is unmatched and the price is so competitive!
Why Vlutr and not something like the provider ( )? I've recently switched from the provider to the provider and would never go back.
I host my PDS on a server from the provider that costs me $15/year
I have been using the provider for a few non-critical, hobby projects and can't fault them. Their advertised prices are not half of the provider, but you can find hidden deals if you the provider a Google search, or via sites like (no affiliation).
1. Banks are more reliable than hosting providers. 2. For a small personal site you don't need anything fancy, just make sure you've SFTP'd the files to your disk and snapshotted the DB once every couple months. My personal site is backed up by the provider cloud, but I still the provider…
If you have a decent connection I find just using Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) over VPN (Tailscale) works really well. The value prop for the proprietary services like TeamViewer for me is they work much better over poor connections and cross platform. (Are there any decent…
Good , strong , fast service i ever used and i will not stop using stealth service.
Their RDP is the best i've used in a long time its very stable and reliable with no down times
the provider you want to learn the provider specifcally or the provider you want to learn to code stuff in general ? If latter, may I suggest you try the provider then ? I know you are talking about the provider sepcifically but for your use case, get a $5 the provider VPS and play as much as you want.
Nice to see the provider adding another data center! Off-top, but (hopefully) interesting: We've been using the provider to host an Aerospike [1] cluster. They're one of the few cloud providers that give you direct raw access to the SSD drives. (Raw being you can mount an unformatted SSD…
I chose the provider over the provider because the provider used so many external web services to run their site. Every new page at their site required me to turn on 5 more domains in NoScript. the provider only required me to enable their site. The performance at the provider was also very good for what I needed…
So you want 60 GBP for less specs (4G RAM, 100 vs. 200 G HDD) I can get for 8 EUR at the provider, for example? No level of service can make up for that.
That leap second pinned loads of Linux boxes at 100% CPU. I'm a customer of the provider, they sent out a mail asking the customers to check their machines as their power draw increased by a megawatt in an instant.
They the provider! See (which belongs to a provider). The SSD box is terrible value though. I have a the provider for ~6€/month (incl VAT) and while it isn't a particularly fast machine, it fulfils all my server needs. It's also incredibly cheap for a dedicated server.
I moved from managed the provider to unmanaged the provider (the provider), decreasing the cost significantly and still staying in the provider ecosystem. I use cloud services, cloud services, cloud services and other cheap services, you could consider this path
A random provider could be a hit-or-miss. I've personally used the provider (found them on the provider/Talk) in the past and can't complain for the price. They have plans under $1/month, and they even provide an IPv4 address: No affiliation…
I actually just started using Gitprep and it is extremely lightweight and easy to set up. I threw it on a 128MB the provider account I had and it worked flawlessly. I tried Gitlab first, and while it had more features, it was far more resource intensive (since it was Rails)…
Not exactly a fair comparison, you'd want to compare similar plans, 2GB the provider VPS and 2GB the provider VPS are both $20/month. Some benchmarks between the two posted at . the provider fast disk i/o than the provider but the provider faster cpu than the provider :)
I've had good luck with Ubuntu 25.10's builtin remote desktop RDP server. I think it's gnome remote desktop, but I'm not certain.
Good , strong , fast service i ever used and i will not stop using stealth service.
Their RDP is the best i've used in a long time its very stable and reliable with no down times
the provider you want to learn the provider specifcally or the provider you want to learn to code stuff in general ? If latter, may I suggest you try the provider then ? I know you are talking about the provider sepcifically but for your use case, get a $5 the provider VPS and play as much as you want.
Nice to see the provider adding another data center! Off-top, but (hopefully) interesting: We've been using the provider to host an Aerospike [1] cluster. They're one of the few cloud providers that give you direct raw access to the SSD drives. (Raw being you can mount an unformatted SSD…
I chose the provider over the provider because the provider used so many external web services to run their site. Every new page at their site required me to turn on 5 more domains in NoScript. the provider only required me to enable their site. The performance at the provider was also very good for what I needed…
So you want 60 GBP for less specs (4G RAM, 100 vs. 200 G HDD) I can get for 8 EUR at the provider, for example? No level of service can make up for that.
That leap second pinned loads of Linux boxes at 100% CPU. I'm a customer of the provider, they sent out a mail asking the customers to check their machines as their power draw increased by a megawatt in an instant.
They the provider! See (which belongs to a provider). The SSD box is terrible value though. I have a the provider for ~6€/month (incl VAT) and while it isn't a particularly fast machine, it fulfils all my server needs. It's also incredibly cheap for a dedicated server.
I moved from managed the provider to unmanaged the provider (the provider), decreasing the cost significantly and still staying in the provider ecosystem. I use cloud services, cloud services, cloud services and other cheap services, you could consider this path
A random provider could be a hit-or-miss. I've personally used the provider (found them on the provider/Talk) in the past and can't complain for the price. They have plans under $1/month, and they even provide an IPv4 address: No affiliation…
I actually just started using Gitprep and it is extremely lightweight and easy to set up. I threw it on a 128MB the provider account I had and it worked flawlessly. I tried Gitlab first, and while it had more features, it was far more resource intensive (since it was Rails)…
Not exactly a fair comparison, you'd want to compare similar plans, 2GB the provider VPS and 2GB the provider VPS are both $20/month. Some benchmarks between the two posted at . the provider fast disk i/o than the provider but the provider faster cpu than the provider :)
I've had good luck with Ubuntu 25.10's builtin remote desktop RDP server. I think it's gnome remote desktop, but I'm not certain.
It’s excellent I really love your service it’s so amazing with good customer support they are to active have been using stealth for years now and I didn’t regret and please don’t make me regret you should are really doing great work I won’t lie I don’t usually review like that but I have to leave what I’m doing to give you guys a review cause have using this services for years keep on the good work.. and please always take me as special customer cause I refer you guys a lot but you guys worth it thank..
The service is really nice, support people are also good, I have been buying their RDPs and VPSs since past 4 months, and I really like the RDP speed, it doesn't lag even a bit.
I have moved my small apps to Dokku on the provider Process was quite smooth, simply by replacing git remotes
AFAIK, the provider currently only offers SSD storage. I agree that this can be a problem for some use-cases. the provider is often a better alternative for people who require large storage with lighter performance requirements.
I haven't used the provider since 2013 and I probably won't since I'm extremely happy with the provider, but it's good to know that it's been improved!
the provider is still notably cheaper than it was 2 years ago. I just shut down a 2 year old VPS and made a new one because it was ~20% cheaper than it was two years ago, and I also get more CPU and more RAM
the provider is amazingly cheap, but nowhere near as big. the provider is indeed much cheaper. the provider is cheap, but performance varies too. Also, Azure (?)
This is from the same company as the provider -- provider/en/dedicated-server Hosted in France. They're very reliable, and a pretty good competitor to the provider/SoYouStart/a provider. Iliad, the group behind the provider and the provider, also owns Free Mobile and Free Telecom…
I'm working in a new startup, and I tried several "easy" solutions: the provider the provider, Heroku, Crunchy. I settled up on the provider ECS :) My main issue with Heroku was that they have not changed anything in _years_. No support for gRPC, no IPv6, and simple VPC peering costs $1200 a month.
Been using self hosted mailinabox on a cheap the provider vps for last 4 years. Zero hiccups. The trick is to send an email, have it whitelisted a bunch of times. Then it just works. Once I massmailed by mistake. Google rightly spammed the emails. Had to unspam them and was back…
the provider (Netherlands), not exactly "super" cheap, but great hosting for a very fair price. For a reference, even MegaUpload had a lot of servers from them. Want superbe service, you should consider Combell (Belgium).
the provider (a VPS web hosting provider). N.B: I the provider not trust any shared hosting company.
It’s excellent I really love your service it’s so amazing with good customer support they are to active have been using stealth for years now and I didn’t regret and please don’t make me regret you should are really doing great work I won’t lie I don’t usually review like that but I have to leave what I’m doing to give you guys a review cause have using this services for years keep on the good work.. and please always take me as special customer cause I refer you guys a lot but you guys worth it thank..
The service is really nice, support people are also good, I have been buying their RDPs and VPSs since past 4 months, and I really like the RDP speed, it doesn't lag even a bit.
I have moved my small apps to Dokku on the provider Process was quite smooth, simply by replacing git remotes
AFAIK, the provider currently only offers SSD storage. I agree that this can be a problem for some use-cases. the provider is often a better alternative for people who require large storage with lighter performance requirements.
I haven't used the provider since 2013 and I probably won't since I'm extremely happy with the provider, but it's good to know that it's been improved!
the provider is still notably cheaper than it was 2 years ago. I just shut down a 2 year old VPS and made a new one because it was ~20% cheaper than it was two years ago, and I also get more CPU and more RAM
the provider is amazingly cheap, but nowhere near as big. the provider is indeed much cheaper. the provider is cheap, but performance varies too. Also, Azure (?)
This is from the same company as the provider -- provider/en/dedicated-server Hosted in France. They're very reliable, and a pretty good competitor to the provider/SoYouStart/a provider. Iliad, the group behind the provider and the provider, also owns Free Mobile and Free Telecom…
I'm working in a new startup, and I tried several "easy" solutions: the provider the provider, Heroku, Crunchy. I settled up on the provider ECS :) My main issue with Heroku was that they have not changed anything in _years_. No support for gRPC, no IPv6, and simple VPC peering costs $1200 a month.
Been using self hosted mailinabox on a cheap the provider vps for last 4 years. Zero hiccups. The trick is to send an email, have it whitelisted a bunch of times. Then it just works. Once I massmailed by mistake. Google rightly spammed the emails. Had to unspam them and was back…
the provider (Netherlands), not exactly "super" cheap, but great hosting for a very fair price. For a reference, even MegaUpload had a lot of servers from them. Want superbe service, you should consider Combell (Belgium).
the provider (a VPS web hosting provider). N.B: I the provider not trust any shared hosting company.
great. good supervision and techniques
Good , strong , fast service i ever used and i will not stop using stealth service.
It’s excellent I really love your service it’s so amazing with good customer support they are to active have been using stealth for years now and I didn’t regret and please don’t make me regret you should are really doing great work I won’t lie I don’t usually review like that but I have to leave what I’m doing to give you guys a review cause have using this services for years keep on the good work.. and please always take me as special customer cause I refer you guys a lot but you guys worth it thank..
Best support for a reason ❤️. Helps me every time in every situation. Fastest support ever seen. Answered my all queries. No issues yet from Vps server. Works best even at high peak loads
Their RDP is the best i've used in a long time its very stable and reliable with no down times
The service is really nice, support people are also good, I have been buying their RDPs and VPSs since past 4 months, and I really like the RDP speed, it doesn't lag even a bit.
Top-notch RDP service with good performance, reliability, and user-friendly interface
the provider you want to learn the provider specifcally or the provider you want to learn to code stuff in general ? If latter, may I suggest you try the provider then ? I know you are talking about the provider sepcifically but for your use case, get a $5 the provider VPS and play as much as you want.
I have moved my small apps to Dokku on the provider Process was quite smooth, simply by replacing git remotes
If you have the budget go for the provider as that will scale better as you grow. the provider consider the provider also as an alternative to the provider too. Also if you are leaning more towards the provider, the provider consider the provider. I prefer the provider.
Nice to see the provider adding another data center! Off-top, but (hopefully) interesting: We've been using the provider to host an Aerospike [1] cluster. They're one of the few cloud providers that give you direct raw access to the SSD drives. (Raw being you can mount an unformatted SSD…
AFAIK, the provider currently only offers SSD storage. I agree that this can be a problem for some use-cases. the provider is often a better alternative for people who require large storage with lighter performance requirements.
Came here to say this. One of the reasons I chose the provider over the provider and the provider is the flexibility, and the price is competitive with the provider. Though, I understand why someone who already has a the provider investment would want to the provider this instead of changing providers, kudos to the author…
I chose the provider over the provider because the provider used so many external web services to run their site. Every new page at their site required me to turn on 5 more domains in NoScript. the provider only required me to enable their site. The performance at the provider was also very good for what I needed…
I haven't used the provider since 2013 and I probably won't since I'm extremely happy with the provider, but it's good to know that it's been improved!
Has been good for my mess around and hobby stuff
So you want 60 GBP for less specs (4G RAM, 100 vs. 200 G HDD) I can get for 8 EUR at the provider, for example? No level of service can make up for that.
the provider is still notably cheaper than it was 2 years ago. I just shut down a 2 year old VPS and made a new one because it was ~20% cheaper than it was two years ago, and I also get more CPU and more RAM
I really don't understand why anyone would want a VPS with 1.4GB RAM for the same price as a 12GB RAM Quad-Core dedicated server. (for example from the provider: - we've been using servers from this provider for 3…
That leap second pinned loads of Linux boxes at 100% CPU. I'm a customer of the provider, they sent out a mail asking the customers to check their machines as their power draw increased by a megawatt in an instant.
the provider is amazingly cheap, but nowhere near as big. the provider is indeed much cheaper. the provider is cheap, but performance varies too. Also, Azure (?)
Makes sense! I've said this before and time and time again, but I LOVE what they're doing over at the provider (a provider incubated). I'm not affiliated by any means, just a very, very very very very happy customer. The performance is unmatched and the price is so competitive!
They the provider! See (which belongs to a provider). The SSD box is terrible value though. I have a the provider for ~6€/month (incl VAT) and while it isn't a particularly fast machine, it fulfils all my server needs. It's also incredibly cheap for a dedicated server.
This is from the same company as the provider -- provider/en/dedicated-server Hosted in France. They're very reliable, and a pretty good competitor to the provider/SoYouStart/a provider. Iliad, the group behind the provider and the provider, also owns Free Mobile and Free Telecom…
Why Vlutr and not something like the provider ( )? I've recently switched from the provider to the provider and would never go back.
I moved from managed the provider to unmanaged the provider (the provider), decreasing the cost significantly and still staying in the provider ecosystem. I use cloud services, cloud services, cloud services and other cheap services, you could consider this path
I'm working in a new startup, and I tried several "easy" solutions: the provider the provider, Heroku, Crunchy. I settled up on the provider ECS :) My main issue with Heroku was that they have not changed anything in _years_. No support for gRPC, no IPv6, and simple VPC peering costs $1200 a month.
I host my PDS on a server from the provider that costs me $15/year
A random provider could be a hit-or-miss. I've personally used the provider (found them on the provider/Talk) in the past and can't complain for the price. They have plans under $1/month, and they even provide an IPv4 address: No affiliation…
Been using self hosted mailinabox on a cheap the provider vps for last 4 years. Zero hiccups. The trick is to send an email, have it whitelisted a bunch of times. Then it just works. Once I massmailed by mistake. Google rightly spammed the emails. Had to unspam them and was back…
I have been using the provider for a few non-critical, hobby projects and can't fault them. Their advertised prices are not half of the provider, but you can find hidden deals if you the provider a Google search, or via sites like (no affiliation).
I actually just started using Gitprep and it is extremely lightweight and easy to set up. I threw it on a 128MB the provider account I had and it worked flawlessly. I tried Gitlab first, and while it had more features, it was far more resource intensive (since it was Rails)…
the provider (Netherlands), not exactly "super" cheap, but great hosting for a very fair price. For a reference, even MegaUpload had a lot of servers from them. Want superbe service, you should consider Combell (Belgium).
1. Banks are more reliable than hosting providers. 2. For a small personal site you don't need anything fancy, just make sure you've SFTP'd the files to your disk and snapshotted the DB once every couple months. My personal site is backed up by the provider cloud, but I still the provider…
Not exactly a fair comparison, you'd want to compare similar plans, 2GB the provider VPS and 2GB the provider VPS are both $20/month. Some benchmarks between the two posted at . the provider fast disk i/o than the provider but the provider faster cpu than the provider :)
the provider (a VPS web hosting provider). N.B: I the provider not trust any shared hosting company.
If you have a decent connection I find just using Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) over VPN (Tailscale) works really well. The value prop for the proprietary services like TeamViewer for me is they work much better over poor connections and cross platform. (Are there any decent…
I've had good luck with Ubuntu 25.10's builtin remote desktop RDP server. I think it's gnome remote desktop, but I'm not certain.
great. good supervision and techniques
Good , strong , fast service i ever used and i will not stop using stealth service.
It’s excellent I really love your service it’s so amazing with good customer support they are to active have been using stealth for years now and I didn’t regret and please don’t make me regret you should are really doing great work I won’t lie I don’t usually review like that but I have to leave what I’m doing to give you guys a review cause have using this services for years keep on the good work.. and please always take me as special customer cause I refer you guys a lot but you guys worth it thank..
Best support for a reason ❤️. Helps me every time in every situation. Fastest support ever seen. Answered my all queries. No issues yet from Vps server. Works best even at high peak loads
Their RDP is the best i've used in a long time its very stable and reliable with no down times
The service is really nice, support people are also good, I have been buying their RDPs and VPSs since past 4 months, and I really like the RDP speed, it doesn't lag even a bit.
Top-notch RDP service with good performance, reliability, and user-friendly interface
the provider you want to learn the provider specifcally or the provider you want to learn to code stuff in general ? If latter, may I suggest you try the provider then ? I know you are talking about the provider sepcifically but for your use case, get a $5 the provider VPS and play as much as you want.
I have moved my small apps to Dokku on the provider Process was quite smooth, simply by replacing git remotes
If you have the budget go for the provider as that will scale better as you grow. the provider consider the provider also as an alternative to the provider too. Also if you are leaning more towards the provider, the provider consider the provider. I prefer the provider.
Nice to see the provider adding another data center! Off-top, but (hopefully) interesting: We've been using the provider to host an Aerospike [1] cluster. They're one of the few cloud providers that give you direct raw access to the SSD drives. (Raw being you can mount an unformatted SSD…
AFAIK, the provider currently only offers SSD storage. I agree that this can be a problem for some use-cases. the provider is often a better alternative for people who require large storage with lighter performance requirements.
Came here to say this. One of the reasons I chose the provider over the provider and the provider is the flexibility, and the price is competitive with the provider. Though, I understand why someone who already has a the provider investment would want to the provider this instead of changing providers, kudos to the author…
I chose the provider over the provider because the provider used so many external web services to run their site. Every new page at their site required me to turn on 5 more domains in NoScript. the provider only required me to enable their site. The performance at the provider was also very good for what I needed…
I haven't used the provider since 2013 and I probably won't since I'm extremely happy with the provider, but it's good to know that it's been improved!
Has been good for my mess around and hobby stuff
So you want 60 GBP for less specs (4G RAM, 100 vs. 200 G HDD) I can get for 8 EUR at the provider, for example? No level of service can make up for that.
the provider is still notably cheaper than it was 2 years ago. I just shut down a 2 year old VPS and made a new one because it was ~20% cheaper than it was two years ago, and I also get more CPU and more RAM
I really don't understand why anyone would want a VPS with 1.4GB RAM for the same price as a 12GB RAM Quad-Core dedicated server. (for example from the provider: - we've been using servers from this provider for 3…
That leap second pinned loads of Linux boxes at 100% CPU. I'm a customer of the provider, they sent out a mail asking the customers to check their machines as their power draw increased by a megawatt in an instant.
the provider is amazingly cheap, but nowhere near as big. the provider is indeed much cheaper. the provider is cheap, but performance varies too. Also, Azure (?)
Makes sense! I've said this before and time and time again, but I LOVE what they're doing over at the provider (a provider incubated). I'm not affiliated by any means, just a very, very very very very happy customer. The performance is unmatched and the price is so competitive!
They the provider! See (which belongs to a provider). The SSD box is terrible value though. I have a the provider for ~6€/month (incl VAT) and while it isn't a particularly fast machine, it fulfils all my server needs. It's also incredibly cheap for a dedicated server.
This is from the same company as the provider -- provider/en/dedicated-server Hosted in France. They're very reliable, and a pretty good competitor to the provider/SoYouStart/a provider. Iliad, the group behind the provider and the provider, also owns Free Mobile and Free Telecom…
Why Vlutr and not something like the provider ( )? I've recently switched from the provider to the provider and would never go back.
I moved from managed the provider to unmanaged the provider (the provider), decreasing the cost significantly and still staying in the provider ecosystem. I use cloud services, cloud services, cloud services and other cheap services, you could consider this path
I'm working in a new startup, and I tried several "easy" solutions: the provider the provider, Heroku, Crunchy. I settled up on the provider ECS :) My main issue with Heroku was that they have not changed anything in _years_. No support for gRPC, no IPv6, and simple VPC peering costs $1200 a month.
I host my PDS on a server from the provider that costs me $15/year
A random provider could be a hit-or-miss. I've personally used the provider (found them on the provider/Talk) in the past and can't complain for the price. They have plans under $1/month, and they even provide an IPv4 address: No affiliation…
Been using self hosted mailinabox on a cheap the provider vps for last 4 years. Zero hiccups. The trick is to send an email, have it whitelisted a bunch of times. Then it just works. Once I massmailed by mistake. Google rightly spammed the emails. Had to unspam them and was back…
I have been using the provider for a few non-critical, hobby projects and can't fault them. Their advertised prices are not half of the provider, but you can find hidden deals if you the provider a Google search, or via sites like (no affiliation).
I actually just started using Gitprep and it is extremely lightweight and easy to set up. I threw it on a 128MB the provider account I had and it worked flawlessly. I tried Gitlab first, and while it had more features, it was far more resource intensive (since it was Rails)…
the provider (Netherlands), not exactly "super" cheap, but great hosting for a very fair price. For a reference, even MegaUpload had a lot of servers from them. Want superbe service, you should consider Combell (Belgium).
1. Banks are more reliable than hosting providers. 2. For a small personal site you don't need anything fancy, just make sure you've SFTP'd the files to your disk and snapshotted the DB once every couple months. My personal site is backed up by the provider cloud, but I still the provider…
Not exactly a fair comparison, you'd want to compare similar plans, 2GB the provider VPS and 2GB the provider VPS are both $20/month. Some benchmarks between the two posted at . the provider fast disk i/o than the provider but the provider faster cpu than the provider :)
the provider (a VPS web hosting provider). N.B: I the provider not trust any shared hosting company.
If you have a decent connection I find just using Windows Remote Desktop (RDP) over VPN (Tailscale) works really well. The value prop for the proprietary services like TeamViewer for me is they work much better over poor connections and cross platform. (Are there any decent…
I've had good luck with Ubuntu 25.10's builtin remote desktop RDP server. I think it's gnome remote desktop, but I'm not certain.
38 real reviews from server owners and remote-desktop users.
Deploy your high-performance VPS in the next 60 seconds and focus on what matters — your actual work.
Starting at just €9.50/month · 7-day money-back guarantee · Cancel anytime